emea top tier firms 2020Legal500 2020

“The individual lawyers within this firm, their knowledge of the shipping sector, and their knowledge of Dutch law make this firm unique. They are very approachable, and offer good value for money.

“The team is commercial, down-to-earth and sensible in its advice. Its turnaround time is impressively quick. The attention to detail is excellent. The right team members are used for each case – which means efficient working practices and no surprises on invoices.


Storm damage and vessel’s fault

In February 2022, storm 'Eunice' passed over the Netherlands with wind gusts of over 100 kilometers per hour. Among other things, the storm lifted the hatches of a barge. These hatches then hit another barge, causing damage to this vessel.

Contamination of cargo, shipper's own fault?

Usually, in the case of carrying a cargo of fuel, the ship's tanks are inspected by a cargo inspector prior to loading. It follows from a recent judgment of the Court of Rotterdam, that the content of the certificate issued by the cargo inspector can have an impact on the liability question and extent of damage.

Maritime court surveyor - who pays the bill?

At the end of 2019, the Rotterdam District Court presented the project "Sailing towards permanent maritime court surveyors". Since then, the Rotterdam Court has appointed maritime court surveyors on several occasions.

The ‘coordinating’ maritime court surveyor: a practical addition to the possibilities of obtaining maritime evidence!

On 4 April 2019 the project group ‘Setting course for permanent maritime court surveyors’ (Afkoersen of vaste maritieme gerechtsdeskundigen) presented its final report during the Dutch-Belgian Colloquium – Journée Schadee 2019 of the Dutch Transport Law Assocation. In the final report a number of suggestions are made for the expansion of the possibilities of appointing maritime court surveyors within the existing Dutch legal framework, including the ‘coordinating’ maritime court surveyor. 

Recently two of our attorneys (Julian van de Velde and Iris Regtien) applied the suggestions of the project group in practice and successfully obtained permission from the District Court in Rotterdam (the Dutch Maritime Court) to appoint a ‘coordinating’ maritime court surveyor. A maritime surveyor of the Belgian Nautical Commission was appointed as court surveyor. This court surveyor went on board of a vessel arriving in the Netherlands together with the parties’ surveyors and representatives, to collect information regarding the cause of an issue arising during the ocean voyage.

The ‘coordinating’ maritime surveyor was particularly well suited in this case, as our clients’ interest was to collect information and documentation on board of the vessel so they would be able to establish the cause of the issue on the basis of this information and documentation. Our clients were the charterers of the vessel and therefore had limited access to certain information and documentation. Further, the shipowner was not willing to cooperate with the investigation of the charterer’s surveyor. By appointing the ‘coordinating’ maritime court surveyor, our clients were able to obtain the necessary information after all.

The possibilities for using a ‘coordinating’ maritime court surveyor are not limited to cases of collection of evidence on board of a vessel by charterers or cargo interests. On the contrary, we think that this option would also be pre-eminently useful in inter alia collision cases where shipowners and their underwriters (H&M and P&I) have an interest in obtaining information and documentation located on board of the other vessel or vessels that were involved with the collision.

Would you like to learn more regarding the above? Or are you interested in finding out what other possibilities there are to collect evidence in maritime matters in the Netherlands, or perhaps you’re more interested in finding out how this can be prevented? If so, please feel free to contact one of our attorneys.